Yes, I thought it had something to do with that. It would be nice if there was a wallet tool for merging wallet files, removing unused bitcoin addresses and as you say resyncing. (I tried to just re-download all the blocks, but as you know the transactions stayed anyway.) What […]

Quote from: riX on January 27, 2010, 12:49:07 Wallets already support multiple bitcoin addresses. You should check out “Options/Change your address” in your bitcoin app 🙂 riX, you are absolutely right! 🙁 Now all I need is a command line version of Bitcoin. Quote from: satoshi on November 27, 2009, 17:27:09 Command […]

Quote from: NewLibertyStandard on January 28, 2010, 09:58:17 Right now I require an email message from customers who send me bitcoins. This is not ideal because if another person knew about a transaction that was occurring, they could take credit for the transaction by sending a message before the person […]

I second the request for 64-bit support, even if it wouldn’t make the app run faster. I’m no expert, but I can’t see any harm in it. On the other hand, it’s a good way to embrace the future. I committed a fix for 64-bit compile and some fixes to […]

Lately when I’ve been trying to send coins, the following popups twice, then the application terminates. EXCEPTION: St13runtime_error SendMoney() : wtxNew.AcceptTransaction() failed c:\Documents and Settings\username\bitcoin-0.2.0\bitcoin.exe in CMyApp::OnExceptionInMainLoop() When i restart bitcoin.exe, the transaction is showing as 0/unconfirmed. The status do not change even when the total block count increases. I’m […]

I wanted to document an issue I encountered when first installing and using the Bitcoin software. Despite a correct installation and port forward settings I noticed that Bitcoin was not generating any coins or ‘blocks’ despite having 20+ connections for the first 24hrs. The block count just remained at 0. […]

Quote from: sirius-m on February 02, 2010, 12:34:08 Quote from: BitcoinFX on February 02, 2010, 09:00:20 Thanks, I understand that and my port 8333 is correctly forwarded to my 24/7 Bitcoin machine. 🙂 However, lets say that I have 2 machines on the same IP running Bitcoin without port 8333 forwarded […]

OK thanks riX. So, once Bitcoin has connected to at least one node then the -connect option will eliminate the 6667 warnings. Is Bitcoin using any kind of ‘peer exchange’ or DHT because this still does not seem to prevent the constant Tor ‘exit’ warnings and therefore Tor’s requirement to […]

We had our first automatic adjustment of the proof-of-work difficulty on 30 Dec 2009. The minimum difficulty is 32 zero bits, so even if only one person was running a node, the difficulty doesn’t get any easier than that.  For most of last year, we were hovering below the minimum. […]

Quote from: Sabunir on February 05, 2010, 17:31:30 Perhaps there should be a feature against this? For instance, if a transaction isn’t accepted by the recipient for a long period of time (a month?), the transaction will be canceled and the coins returned to the one who sent them? That’s […]