Hello to the other developers, I finally got a working build environment set up on my Ubuntu machine here and have been perusing the sourcecode a bit. So far I like what I am seeing, the program makes use of the standard template library to avoid messy data structure code […]
Read moreAuthor: Satoshi Nakamoto
Re: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test
Build 0.3.1 on an x86 gentoo linux system with my own makefile (builds a dynamic client instead of a static one), seems to run more smoothly than 0.3.0. B.T.W. Why does the standard makefile builds a static version anyway? Because of all the dependencies that different systems don’t have. It’s […]
Read moreRe: Resending transaction
I created a send coins transaction when my laptop was offline; now it’s stuck at 0/unconfirmed and not visible to the recipient, even though other transactions I created later went through. How do I force the transaction to be re-sent to the network so it can make progress? Or alternately, […]
Read moreRe: Fedora 13 libcrypto
I get this when trying to run bitcoin: [michael@fed13 64]$ ./bitcoin ./bitcoin: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Fedora 13 uses this: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0a How can I get around this? I tried a symlink and running ldd and ldconfig to no […]
Read moreRe: Assertion Failure – Ubuntu Lucid
I’m running Ubuntu Lucid (32 bit), all packages up to date. I had run bitcoin 0.2 previously, and just downloaded 0.3. I ran bitcoind and I got: bitcoin: main.cpp:823: unsigned int GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex*): Assertion `pindexFirst’ failed. Aborted So I ran the bitcoin GUI, and it came up and showed my […]
Read moreRe: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing
The proof-of-work difficulty is currently 45.38. (see http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php) It’s about to increase again in a few hours. It’s only been 3-4 days since the last increase, so I expect it will increase by the max of 4 times, or very nearly the max. That would put it at 181.54. The […]
Read moreRe: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon”
Also using 120 DPI here. Same bit depth and resolution as the previous user as well. That must be it then. It must be looking for a larger icon like 20×20 but we don’t have one. Related posts: Re: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon” Quote from: bdonlan […]
Read moreRe: Donations to freebitcoins.appspot.com needed!
The Bitcoin Faucet is handling the slashdotting really well… except that I’m running out of coins to give away. over 5,000 have flowed out of the Faucet since I refilled it last night. Any of you early adopters who generated tens of thousands of coins back in the early days, […]
Read moreRe: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test
Satoshi, you didn’t fix the bug; you just ripped out the minimize to tray code. Could you possibly make this optional? I wasn’t experiencing the original bug, and I very much like the minimize to tray feature. Run it with the undocumented switch -minimizetotray and the option is available in […]
Read moreRe: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon”
Quote from: bdonlan on July 15, 2010, 23:27:14 in 120DPI mode. What is “120DPI mode”? Is that an actual setting somewhere? Sounds like an obscure enough candidate. I suppose it needs twice the resolution icon to fill the size of the upper left corner icon. Only one size is provided. […]
Read more