Re: wxWidgets 2.9.0

Quote from: Cdecker on February 27, 2010, 17:09:59 Looking through the source of 2.8.10 it appears that unicode is possible with that version too. In the Windows world, “unicode” means UTF-16 (wchar). 2.8 has two build variations, ANSI and UTF-16 (unicode).  The UTF-16 version is the “unicode” version provided in […]

Read more

Re: New icon/logo

Quote from: Cdecker on February 27, 2010, 03:24:07 How about an SVG version? That way we could automatically generate smaller and larger versions as needed. I don’t know how to do SVG, but I did the original very large, over 500 pixels across, so it can be scaled down.  I’ll […]

Read more

Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC

Using DB-4.7.25 fixed that problem. I’m now getting this error, though: g++ -O0 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -I”/usr/include” -I”/opt/tdep/include” -o bitcoind -L”/usr/lib” -L”/usr/local/lib” -L”/opt/tdep/lib” obj/nogui/util.o obj/nogui/script.o obj/nogui/db.o obj/nogui/net.o obj/nogui/irc.o obj/nogui/main.o obj/nogui/rpc.o obj/nogui/init.o obj/sha.o -l wx_baseu-2.9 -Wl,-Bstatic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l db_cxx -Wl,-Bdynamic -l crypto -l gthread-2.0 obj/nogui/init.o: […]

Read more

Re: New icon/logo

Excellent. This would be a good resource for those participating in the banner contest. Why unequal dimensions? My only suggestion would be to make the coin’s text stand out more. At tiny resolutions outlines tend to be come unworkable, so a better option may be to experiment with contrast. Making […]

Read more

Re: Command Line and JSON-RPC

I’m getting errors when trying to compile with just wxBase. g++ -c -O0 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -I”/opt/tdep/include” -I”/usr/include” -DwxUSE_GUI=0 -o obj/nogui/util.o util.cpp In file included from util.cpp:5: headers.h:22:24: error: wx/clipbrd.h: No such file or directory In file included from headers.h:100, from util.cpp:5: db.h: In member function ‘bool […]

Read more

Re: New icon/logo

Quote from: Sabunir on February 25, 2010, 01:47:56 I like them. Do they come in higher resolutions? Yes, the original is 546×531 pixels. It looks good at larger size too, but since the small icons are what you mostly always see, I wanted to judge it on those first.  I’ll […]

Read more

Re: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing

The automatic adjustment happened earlier today. 24/02/2010 0000000043b3e500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 24/02/2010  3.78  +49% I updated the first post. Related posts: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing We had our first automatic adjustment of the proof-of-work difficulty… Re: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing We had our first automatic adjustment of the proof-of-work difficulty… Re: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing New […]

Read more
1 2 3 5