I’m running Ubuntu Lucid (32 bit), all packages up to date. I had run bitcoin 0.2 previously, and just downloaded 0.3. I ran bitcoind and I got: bitcoin: main.cpp:823: unsigned int GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex*): Assertion `pindexFirst’ failed. Aborted So I ran the bitcoin GUI, and it came up and showed my […]
Read moreCategory: Bitcoin Talk
Re: Proof-of-work difficulty increasing
The proof-of-work difficulty is currently 45.38. (see http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php) It’s about to increase again in a few hours. It’s only been 3-4 days since the last increase, so I expect it will increase by the max of 4 times, or very nearly the max. That would put it at 181.54. The […]
Read moreRe: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon”
Also using 120 DPI here. Same bit depth and resolution as the previous user as well. That must be it then. It must be looking for a larger icon like 20×20 but we don’t have one. Related posts: Re: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon” Quote from: bdonlan […]
Read moreRe: Donations to freebitcoins.appspot.com needed!
The Bitcoin Faucet is handling the slashdotting really well… except that I’m running out of coins to give away. over 5,000 have flowed out of the Faucet since I refilled it last night. Any of you early adopters who generated tens of thousands of coins back in the early days, […]
Read moreRe: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test
Satoshi, you didn’t fix the bug; you just ripped out the minimize to tray code. Could you possibly make this optional? I wasn’t experiencing the original bug, and I very much like the minimize to tray feature. Run it with the undocumented switch -minimizetotray and the option is available in […]
Read moreRe: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon”
Quote from: bdonlan on July 15, 2010, 23:27:14 in 120DPI mode. What is “120DPI mode”? Is that an actual setting somewhere? Sounds like an obscure enough candidate. I suppose it needs twice the resolution icon to fill the size of the upper left corner icon. Only one size is provided. […]
Read moreRe: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test
Quote from: RHorning on July 15, 2010, 22:29:28 I don’t see either happening, although it did get put into the “Startup” folder. That is so Windows 95ish (just kidding….. Microsoft has so screwed this up that it isn’t even funny). I would recommend the registry settings for a number of […]
Read moreRe: Runaway CPU usage for 64bit BitCoin (Linux Client)
The fix for the thread priority level on linux is available in the 0.3.1 release candidate here: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=383.msg3198#msg3198 Related posts: Re: Runaway CPU usage for 64bit BitCoin (Linux Client) I did a forum search, didn’t see this mentioned by… Re: Runaway CPU usage for 64bit BitCoin (Linux Client) Could you […]
Read moreRe: “SetIcons(): icon bundle doesn’t contain any suitable icon”
In Windows, when opening the “Send Coins” or the “Your Receiving Addresses”, I get the following message. Clicking Cancel allows me to make it go away, and everything still works fine, but it is still a bit annoying. I am running BitCoin 0.3.0 on Windowx Vista SP2 x64. That’s surprising […]
Read moreRe: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test
Quote from: db on July 15, 2010, 20:39:08 The listreceivedbyaddress and getreceivedbyaddress commands are duplicated in bincoind help. (Same in 0.3.0.) Yes a bug. It’ll have to be fixed in the next version. Related posts: Re: 0.3.1 release candidate, please test Quote from: knightmb on July 15, 2010, 20:15:46 On […]
Read more