Quote from: knightmb on August 15, 2010, 22:59:04 [edit] Just saw your post, I’ll build one to less than 74,000 then, should at least save you technical people a few minutes of downloading the new chain. 😉 Just leave the old one alone!  Older is better.  What block number is […]

seems a block at height 74638 has expoited a bug in the net. It uses an integer overflow to make a negative total transaction. The two transaction outputs are: out Value:92233720368.54(7ffffffffff85ee0) out Value:92233720368.54(7ff ffffffff85ee0) We need a fix asap Edit: (satoshi) 0.3.10 patch download links here: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827.0 Don’t update the […]

seems a block at height 74638 has expoited a bug in the net. It uses an integer overflow to make a negative total transaction. The two transaction outputs are: out Value:92233720368.54(7ffffffffff85ee0) out Value:92233720368.54(7ff ffffffff85ee0) We need a fix asap Edit: (satoshi) 0.3.10 patch download links here: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827.0 Patch is uploaded […]

I’m afraid the community is just too big and distributed now to expect much in the way of voluntary quick action on anything, especially generation which I’m sure many have on automatic and largely unmoderated. Once you have an update, you could download knightmb’s block chain.  You’ll want one that’s […]

seems a block at height 74638 has expoited a bug in the net. It uses an integer overflow to make a negative total transaction. The two transaction outputs are: out Value:92233720368.54(7ffffffffff85ee0) out Value:92233720368.54(7ff ffffffff85ee0) We need a fix asap Edit: (satoshi) 0.3.10 patch download links here: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827.0 It would help […]

seems a block at height 74638 has expoited a bug in the net. It uses an integer overflow to make a negative total transaction. The two transaction outputs are: out Value:92233720368.54(7ffffffffff85ee0) out Value:92233720368.54(7ff ffffffff85ee0) We need a fix asap Edit: (satoshi) 0.3.10 patch download links here: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827.0 Here’s the preliminary […]

Where is the code for this? I’m on a CentOS 5.5 box and need to build it myself. Once I do that I will report back with linux 32-bit and 1MB cache Xeon. I just uploaded a quick build so testers can check if I built it right.  (I don’t […]

I did a quick test, will report back when I try it on more machines. Pentium E5300 Dual-Core 2.6 GHz (2MB cache, FSB 800MHz) Processor info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfdale_%28microprocessor%29 Stock = 2261 khash/s 4-way = 1103 khash/s (64 bit) Pentium 4 – 3.0GHz (hyper-threading off) 1MB Cache, FSB 800MHz Processor info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetBurst_%28microarchitecture%29 […]

Quote from: jgarzik on August 15, 2010, 17:46:27 the extended-help might have been based on my idea, but the code was somewhat different. The idea was the main part.  When you posted your patch, I realized it should have been done that way instead of “-?”.  I always had reservations […]